Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Rachell's avatar

Yolked was able to really tap into an audience by capturing authentic responses to their product. As long as an audience is well-aware of the relationship with the sponsor, that authenticity remains both powerful and proof-worthy. But, if there is a hint of collusion, that can backfire, have devastating affect. The influencer, Kyle Scheele, and his Scheele Meal Deal with a regional C-Store comes to mind. Scheele had millions of people hooked on a "prank" that ended up being a full-gamut fake prank that wildly backfired for both himself and the "Kum & Go" C-store chain. For reference: https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/tiktoker-kyle-scheele-admits-viral-kum-go-meal-was-actually-staged-1710748/

Expand full comment
Ben Goss's avatar

Two key word takeaways:

- EMPATHY

- AUTHENTICITY

To me, no matter how basic or complex a sponsorship is, without those things, it won’t work. If those two things are present, it definitely stands a chance.

Also, I’m a major proponent for keeping partnerships/sponsorships simple, because those are generally the more effective ones.

Yes, complexities are necessary in many instances, but not always, and I’d rather tackle a partnership with a series of small, quasi-guerrilla tactics like this than a multilayered, convoluted approach with metrics that don’t matter.

Yes, I also like the Charlie Daniels song “Simple Man!”

Great deep-dive on this deal!

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts